In Fuller v Australian Capital Territory [2022] ACTSC 361, the ACT Supreme Court considered whether medical practitioners at Canberra Hospital acted negligently during a spinal anaesthetic procedure.
In Bell v Nexus Primary Health [2022] VSC 605, the Victorian Supreme Court considered whether an employer’s duty of care to its employees is constrained to the workplace.
In Austen v Tran [2022] ACTSC 114, the ACT Supreme Court considered whether a medical practitioner had breached his duty of care by failing to diagnose a patient with non-Hodgkins lymphoma earlier.
New laws have commenced in Victoria, making alterations to nurse-to-patient ratios on specified shifts at small hospitals, in special care nurseries and in birthing suits.
In Fuller v Australian Capital Territory [2022] ACTSC 361, the ACT Supreme Court considered whether medical practitioners at Canberra Hospital acted negligently during a spinal anaesthetic procedure.
In Bell v Nexus Primary Health [2022] VSC 605, the Victorian Supreme Court considered whether an employer’s duty of care to its employees is constrained to the workplace.
In Austen v Tran [2022] ACTSC 114, the ACT Supreme Court considered whether a medical practitioner had breached his duty of care by failing to diagnose a patient with non-Hodgkins lymphoma earlier.
New laws have commenced in Victoria, making alterations to nurse-to-patient ratios on specified shifts at small hospitals, in special care nurseries and in birthing suits.
Law Compliance is a legislative compliance business of Health Legal.
SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER:
INFORMATION
TEAM
© HealthLegal 2024 All Rights Reserved | Website Design by Kitsune Creative Co | This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
